1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 766 N.W.2d
  5. 766 N.W.2d 311 (2009)
 

BURISE v. CITY OF PONTIAC

Docket No. 281443.

766 N.W.2d 311 (2009)

282 Mich. App. 646

BURISE v. CITY OF PONTIAC.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided March 12, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paskel Tashman & Walker, P.C. (by Michael S. Tashman), Southfield, for the plaintiffs.

Law Offices of Berry, Johnston, Sztykiel, Hunt & McCandless, P.C. (by Eric S. Goldstein), Troy, for the defendant.

Before: DONOFRIO, P.J., and K.F. KELLY and BECKERING, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, the city of Pontiac, appeals as of right the trial court's order denying its motion for summary disposition brought pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) (immunity granted by law). Because plaintiff Wilhelmena Burise1 timely served defendant with "a notice" conforming to the requirements of MCL 691.1404(1), we affirm, although for reasons other than those relied on by the trial court. This appeal has been decided without oral...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases