1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 761 N.W.2d
  5. 761 N.W.2d 826 (2009)
 

AVINK v. SMG

Docket No. 280241.

761 N.W.2d 826 (2009)

282 Mich. App. 110

AVINK v. SMG.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided January 20, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith Haughey Rice & Roegge (by Jon D. Vander Ploeg and Marilyn S. Nickell Tyree), Grand Rapids, for SMG.

Plunkett Cooney (by Christine D. Oldani, Detroit, and Mark H. Verwys), Grand Rapids, for Overhead Door Company of Grand Rapids.

Before: BECKERING, P.J., and WHITBECK and M.J. KELLY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant/cross-plaintiff SMG appeals by leave granted the trial court's ruling that the Plunkett & Cooney law firm's representation of SMG in an unrelated matter did not create a conflict of interest that precluded it from representing defendant/cross-defendant Overhead Door Company of Grand Rapids in this matter. This ruling allowed Plunkett & Cooney to continue as counsel for Overhead Door in this matter. We reverse.

I. BASIC FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases