1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 761 N.W.2d
  5. 761 N.W.2d 872 (2008)
 

SHERMAN-NADIV v. FARM BUREAU GEN. INS. CO.

No. 279302.

761 N.W.2d 872 (2008)

SHERMAN-NADIV v. FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided November 20, 2008.

Approved for publication January 13, 2009, at 9:05 a.m.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Demorest Law Firm, PLLC (by Mark S. Demorest and Melissa L. Demorest), Birmingham, for the plaintiffs.

Moblo & Fleming, P.C. (by Daniel J. Fleming, Livonia, and Allison L. Silverstein), for the defendant.

Before: JANSEN, P.J., and O'CONNELL and OWENS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this insurance action, plaintiffs appeal as of right, arguing both that defendant was improperly granted a motion in limine because the language forming the basis for the denial of coverage was ambiguous and that the jury's finding that the subject premises had been vacant for 30 days before the loss occurred was against the great weight of the evidence. We affirm.

Plaintiffs, Rochelle Sherman-Nadiv...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases