1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 277 A.3d
  5. 277 A.3d 991 (2022)
 

STATE v. MATTHEWS

No. 15, Sept. Term, 2021.

277 A.3d 991 (2022)

479 Md. 278

STATE of Maryland v. Kirk MATTHEWS.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 22, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Peter R. Naugle , Asst. Atty. Gen. ( Brian E. Frosh , Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Helki Philipsen , Asst. Public Defender ( Paul B. DeWolfe , Public Defender of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for Respondent.

Argued before: Getty, C.J., McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Booth, Biran, Alan M. Wilner (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

In Rochkind v. Stevenson, 471 Md. 1, 236 A.3d 630 (2020), this Court adopted the analysis set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), concerning the admissibility of expert testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases