1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 272 A.3d
  5. 272 A.3d 347 (2022)
 

WILLIAMS v. STATE

No. 37, Sept. Term, 2021.

272 A.3d 347 (2022)

478 Md. 99

Nicholas Jabbar WILLIAMS v. STATE of Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

March 25, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by J. Alejandro Barrientos and Kevin B. Collins ( Alexander Levin , Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC), on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Derek Simmonsen , Asst. Atty. Gen. ( Brian E. Frosh , Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Respondent.

Argued before: Getty, C.J., McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Booth, Biran, and Alan M. Wilner (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

Maryland case law establishes that verdicts can be inconsistent in two ways—legally and factually. In a criminal case, verdicts are legally inconsistent where a defendant is convicted of an offense but acquitted of another offense that has the same elements as the offense of which the defendant was convicted. See McNeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases