PIFER v. IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL

No. 1849, Sept. Term, 2019.

258 A.3d 879 (2021)

252 Md. App. 57

Christine PIFER, et al. v. IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL CO.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

September 1, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by: Daniel A. Brown ( Matthew E. Kiely , Eileen M. O'Brien , Brown, Kiely, LLP, on the brief) Bethesda, MD, for Appellant.

Argued by: Matthew T. Wagman ( Joseph W. Hovermill , F. Ford Loker , Susan DuMont , Miles & Stockbridge, PC, on the brief) Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.

Nazarian, Shaw Geter, Wells, JJ.


The ostensible main issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting a motion in limine to exclude evidence on authenticity grounds. But underlying that seemingly preliminary meta-question —is there evidence sufficient to support a finding that a piece of evidence a plaintiff would like to offer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases