1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 230 A.3d
  5. 230 A.3d 80 (2020)
 

BARCLAY v. CASTRUCCIO

No. 30, Sept. Term, 2019.

230 A.3d 80 (2020)

469 Md. 368

Darlene BARCLAY v. Sadie M. CASTRUCCIO.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 30, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by David E. Sessions ( Frederick R. Franke, Jr. , Jack K. Beckett , Deborah F. Howe and Samuel C. Draper , Franke, Sessions & Beckett, LLC, Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Kenneth B. Frank (Kenneth B. Frank, P.A., Baltimore, MD) and Cynthia E. Young (Annapolis, MD), on brief, for Respondent.

Barbera, C.J. McDonald, Hotten, Getty, Booth, Sally D. Adkins, (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) Alan M. Wilner, (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ.

We are asked—again—to recognize the tort of intentional interference with an inheritance or gift. Petitioner Darlene Barclay, the residuary beneficiary of the Estate of Dr. Peter A. Castruccio (the "Estate"), alleges that Respondent Sadie M. Castruccio,1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases