1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 228 A.3d
  5. 228 A.3d 171 (2020)
 

STATE v. SAMPLE

No. 54, Sept. Term, 2019.

228 A.3d 171 (2020)

468 Md. 560

STATE of Maryland, v. Hayes SAMPLE.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

May 11, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Peter R. Naugle , Asst. Atty. Gen. ( Brian E. Frosh , Atty. Gen. of Maryland of Baltimore, MD) on brief, for Petitioner.

Argued by Rachel Marblestone Kamins , Asst. Public Defender ( Paul B. DeWolfe , Public Defender of Maryland of Baltimore, MD) on brief, for Respondent.

Argued before: Barbera, C.J.; McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, Booth and Biran, JJ.

It is axiomatic that for a trial court to admit evidence, there must be sufficient indicia that the evidence is authentic—i.e., that the evidence "is what its proponent claims." Md. R. 5-901(a). A party can sufficiently authenticate evidence through "[c]ircumstantial evidence, such as appearance, contents, substance, internal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases