1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 117 A.3d
  5. 117 A.3d 52 (2015)
 

CASH & CARRY v. ROOF SOLUTIONS

No. 2122, September Term, 2012.

117 A.3d 52 (2015)

223 Md. App. 451

CASH & CARRY AMERICA, INC. v. ROOF SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

June 30, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sterling G. Mead , Rockville, MD, for appellant.

Steven R. Migdal (Buck, Migdal & Myers, Annapolis, MD), Nimalan Amirthalingam ( Christopher E. Hassell , Bonner, Kiernan, Trebach & Crociata, LLP, Washington, DC), of the briefs, for appellee.

Panel: DEBORAH S. EYLER, WOODWARD, and RAYMOND G. THIEME, JR. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

The primary question in this case is whether a roofing contractor who performs work on a structure owes a duty of care in tort to a third party owner of personal property inside the structure. The answer is yes, although there are limits on the type of property damage encompassed by this duty of care, as we shall discuss.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases