1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 78 A.3d
  5. 78 A.3d 415 (2013)
 

HOLT v. STATE

No. 98, September Term, 2012.

78 A.3d 415 (2013)

435 Md. 443

Jamar HOLT v. STATE of Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

October 28, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth W. Ravenell ( Milin Chun , Murphy, Falcon & Murphy, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for petitioner.

Thiruvendran Vignarajah , Special Asst. Atty. Gen. ( Carrie J. Williams , Asst. Atty. Gen., Douglas F. Gansler , Atty. Gen. of Maryland, Baltimore, MD), on brief, for respondent.

Submitted before BARBERA, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, ADKINS, McDONALD, and ALAN M. WILNER (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

BARBERA, C.J.

It is settled that a law enforcement officer may conduct an investigatory stop of an individual if the officer has a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30-31, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Reasonable suspicion is not a demanding standard, but it does require more than an "unparticularized suspicion or hunch." Id. at 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868 (internal quotations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases