PER CURIAM.
Denied. The district court did not err in finding that relator's application raises claims that relator inexcusably failed to raise on direct and collateral review pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. In addition, relator fails to show he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.