PER CURIAM.
The district court ruled all photographs obtained from the defendant's cell phone, pursuant to a search warrant, were inadmissible. In this court, the state argues the district court erred in excluding four of the photographs.
We find that, of the four photographs the state seeks to introduce, the district court erred in ruling that the photograph identified as "G-1" could not be admitted into evidence. Photograph "G-1," like the other three photographs...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
