SAUNDERS, Judge.
Herein, we address whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee and in finding that prescription had not been interrupted as to the Appellants' mineral servitude. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
The case before us addresses a mineral servitude wherein the Appellants claim to be the owners of an undivided 1722/3042 interest...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.