HUGHES v. UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS

2021-SC-0444-DG.

677 S.W.3d 273 (2023)

Marion HUGHES; James A. Crume; Phillip L. Western; Raymond S. Batts; and Terri A. Rogers, Appellants, v. UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC.; United Parcel Service, Inc., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

August 24, 2023.

Modified: August 24, 2023.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: Andrew Michael Grabhorn , Michael Douglas Grabhorn , Grabhorn Law, Louisville, Andrew John Horne , Horne Law Office.

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES: Samuel Benjamin Goldstein , Joseph Russell Palmore , Morrison & Foerster, LLP, Kyle Donald Johnson , Louisville, Charles Laurence Woods, III , Frost Brown Todd, LLC, John Choate Roach , Ransdell Roach & Royce, PLLC, Lexington.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, AIRLINES FOR AMERICA: James Burton Lind , Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, LLP.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: Philip Williamson , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL UNION 369: Benjamin Sequoyah Basil , Schulz Messex Dermody, PLLC.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 783: Jerome Park Prather , Garmer & Prather, PLLC, Lexington.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Philip Williamson , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, KENTUCKY EQUAL JUSTICE CENTER: John Saoirse Friend , Louisville, Friend Law, PSC.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, KENTUCKY JUSTICE ASSOCIATION: Michele Diane Henry , Louisville, Craig Henry, PLC.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, KENTUCKY RETAIL FEDERATION: Philip Williamson , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION: Philip Williamson , Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

The Petition for Rehearing, filed by the Appellants, of the Opinion of the Court, rendered March 23, 2023, is DENIED.

On the Court's own motion, however, the Opinion of the Court, rendered on March 23, 2023, is modified and the Opinion of the Court is hereby ORDERED SUBSTITUTED for the Opinion originally rendered. The modification does not affect the holding of the original Opinion.

All...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases