1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 642 S.W.3d
  5. 642 S.W.3d 660 (2022)
 

WATSON v. LANDMARK UROLOGY, P.S.C.

2020-SC-0587-DG.

642 S.W.3d 660 (2022)

Charmin WATSON and Stephen Watson, Appellants, v. LANDMARK UROLOGY, P.S.C. and Amberly Kay Windisch, M.D., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

March 24, 2022.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: Bruce Clark Batten, II , David Seth Coomer , Stephen M. O'Brien , O'Brien Batten & Kirtley, PLLC, Lexington.

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES: Clayton Lee Robinson , Lexington, Jonathan David Weber , Robinson & Havens, P.S.C.

COUNSEL FOR AMICUS CURIAE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND KENTUCKY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: Sarah Cronan Spurlock , Bethany A. Breetz , Stites & Harbison, PLLC, Louisville, Philip S. Goldberg , Shook Hardy & Bacon, LLP.

Prior to performing a medical procedure, a health care provider is generally required to obtain the patient's informed consent. In Kentucky, the requirements for informed consent are established by statute. KRS1 304.40-320. The issue we resolve in this case is whether the Scott...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases