STATE v. MONTGOMERY

No. 122,237.

494 P.3d 147 (2021)

STATE of Kansas, Appellant, v. David Clayton MONTGOMERY, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed August 27, 2021.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob M. Gontesky , assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and Stephen M. Howe , district attorney, and Derek Schmidt , attorney general, were with him on the briefs for appellant.

James M. Latta , of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellee.


David Clayton Montgomery argues the dissimilarity between past offenses and the current offense of conviction can support departing from the presumptive sentence established by the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA or Guidelines) as a matter of law. The district court agreed, finding a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases