1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 441 P.3d
  5. 441 P.3d 1058 (2019)
 

SHORT v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KAN

No. 118,688.

441 P.3d 1058 (2019)

Zachary SHORT, Appellant, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Opinion filed April 12, 2019.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew L. Bretz , of Bretz & Young, L.L.C., of Hutchinson, for appellant.

David S. Wooding and Anna C. Ritchie , of Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, L.L.P., of Wichita, for appellee.

Before Arnold-Burger, C.J., Atcheson, J., and Burgess, S.J.

The cardinal rule of contract interpretation is to ascertain the parties' intent. If the contract is unambiguous, we determine the parties' intent by the language of the contract alone. But if a contract has ambiguous language, we may consider extrinsic evidence to construe it.

Zachary Short sued Blue Cross and Blue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases