Weissmann, Judge.
[1] Utility is in the eye of the beholder. In this case, a small body of water—characterized as both a necessary highway drainage pond and a weed-infested swamp, ill-suited to a high-end subdivision—spouted an inverse condemnation action that cost the State $216,640.56. The State now appeals, arguing that the trial...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.