SOCKRIDER v. BURT, BLEE, DIXON, SUTTON

Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-PL-1155.

135 N.E.3d 638 (2019)

Susan SOCKRIDER, Appellant-Defendant, v. BURT, BLEE, DIXON, SUTTON, AND BLOOM, LLP, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

FILED November 13, 2019.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney for Appellant: Jon R. Pactor , Indianapolis, Indiana.

Attorneys for Appellee: Jeremy J. Grogg , Burt Blee Dixon Sutton & Bloom, LLP, Fort Wayne, Indiana.


STATEMENT OF THE CASE

[1] Appellant-Defendant, Susan Sockrider (Sockrider), appeals the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff, Burt Blee Dixon Sutton & Bloom, LLP (Burt Blee), which concluded that no genuine issue of material fact exists that the parties entered into a valid contingency fee agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases