1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 69 N.E.3d
  5. 69 N.E.3d 567 (2017)
 

HAMILTON COUNTY ASSESSOR v. DUKE

Cause No. 49T10-1309-TA-00069.

69 N.E.3d 567 (2017)

HAMILTON COUNTY ASSESSOR, Petitioner, v. Charles E. DUKE, Respondent.

Tax Court of Indiana.

February 3, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: MARILYN S. MEIGHEN , ATTORNEY AT LAW, Carmel, IN, BRIAN A. CUSIMANO , ATTORNEY AT LAW, Indianapolis, IN.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: BRADLEY D. HASLER , BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP, Indianapolis, IN.

This case concerns whether the Indiana Board of Tax Review erred when it determined that, for the 2009, 2010, and 2011 tax years (the "years at issue"), Charles E. Duke's real property qualified for an educational purposes exemption, but did not qualify for a religious purposes exemption. The Court reverses the Indiana Board's determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases