1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.3d
  4. 15 N.E.3d
  5. 15 N.E.3d 1006 (2014)
 

POHL v. POHL

No. 32S04-1404-DR-245.

15 N.E.3d 1006 (2014)

Barbara J. POHL, Appellant (Respondent), v. Michael G. POHL, Appellee (Petitioner).

Supreme Court of Indiana.

September 9, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah M. Agard , Daniel W. Kiehl , Law Office of Deborah M. Agard, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.

Robert C. Rothkopf , Thomas L. Landwerlen , Landwerlen & Rothkopf, L.L.P., Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

RUSH, Chief Justice.

Nearly twenty years ago, our decision in Voigt v. Voigt reserved the question of whether a court may modify a maintenance obligation that originates in a settlement agreement, but rests on grounds such as incapacity that would have permitted an identical award even in the absence of an agreement. 670 N.E.2d 1271, 1280 n. 13 (Ind.1996). That question poses a choice between a rock and a hard place: As ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases