1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 989 N.E.2d
  5. 989 N.E.2d 758 (2013)
 

PERKINSON v. PERKINSON

No. 36S05-1206-DR-371.

989 N.E.2d 758 (2013)

Michael D. PERKINSON, Jr., Appellant (Petitioner below), v. Kay Char PERKINSON, Appellee (Respondent below).

Supreme Court of Indiana.

June 25, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy O. Carson , Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Thomas J. Lantz , Seymour, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

On Petition to Transfer from the Indiana Court of Appeals, No. 36A05-1106-DR-322

DAVID, Justice.

The concept of parents negotiating away parenting time as a means to eliminate the obligation to pay child support is repugnant and contrary to public policy. Attorneys should refuse to be a part of such discussion and should advise their clients that any such discussion is unacceptable. Here, an agreement to forego parenting time in exchange for relief from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases