1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 969 N.E.2d
  5. 969 N.E.2d 1048 (2012)
 

IN RE S.H.

No. 73A01-1109-CR-468.

969 N.E.2d 1048 (2012)

In re Prosecutor's Subpoena Regarding S.H. and S.C., S.H., Appellant, v. State of Indiana, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

June 22, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cara Schaefer Wieneke , Wieneke Law Office, LLC, Plainfield, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Gregory F. Zoeller , Attorney General of Indiana, Ian McLean , Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

S.H. and S.C. (collectively, "Parents") appeal a trial court order granting the State's petition to compel their testimony by providing use immunity. Parents argue a prosecutor may not grant use immunity when there is no grand jury proceeding and the persons whose testimony is sought have not been charged with a crime.

We affirm.1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 27, 2010...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases