1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 966 N.E.2d
  5. 966 N.E.2d 177 (2012)
 

GAGAN v. YAST

No. 45A05-1107-CT-377.

966 N.E.2d 177 (2012)

James GAGAN, Fred Wittlinger, Jack Allen and Eugene Deutsch, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. C. Joseph YAST, Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

April 5, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Abrahamson , Jonathan E. Halm , Abrahamson, Reed & Bilse, Hammond, IN, Brian Custy , Merrillville, IN, Attorneys for Appellants.

Karl L. Mulvaney , Nana Quay-Smith , Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, Indianapolis, IN, F. Joseph Jaskowiak , Lauren K. Roeger , Kevin G.L. Kerr , Hoeppner, Wagner & Evans, Valparaiso, IN, Natalie Vangel Shrader , Burke, Costanza & Carberry LLP, Merrillville, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Today we decide that the appellee-defendant attorney's alleged defamatory statements that he made against his former clients, the appellants-plaintiffs, were protected on the grounds of qualified privilege.

Appellants-plaintiffs James Gagan, Fred Wittlinger, Jack Allen, and Eugene Deutsch (collectively, Gagan) appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant C. Joseph Yast, on their claim against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases