1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 919 N.E.2d
  5. 919 N.E.2d 1169 (2010)
 

HICKS v. SMITH

No. 54A01-0904-CV-189.

919 N.E.2d 1169 (2010)

Mark E. HICKS, Appellant-Petitioner, v. Tammy L. (Hicks) SMITH, Appellee-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

January 19, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Inman, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

William A. Goebel, Thomas D. Sarver, Goebel Law Offices, Crawfordsville, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Mark Hicks appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of his ex-wife, Tammy Hicks, for child support arrearage. Hicks raises one issue for our review, which we restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding a judgment to Tammy. Concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

Mark and Tammy are the parents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases