tent="200">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

GODLIN v. HOCKETT

No. 35625.

272 P.2d 389 (1954)

GODLIN v. HOCKETT et al.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Ogden, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.

J. Harold Land and John T. Edwards, Oklahoma City, for defendants in error.


JOHNSON, Vice Chief Justice.

The factual situation (pleadings and contentions of the parties) may be briefly summarized as follows: That plaintiff in error, Louis Godlin, is the owner of land known as Crutcho Park Addition and said land abuts Crutcho Creek upstream from the land of defendants in error, Banny W. Hockett and Marian E. Hockett, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs and defendant. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    IN RE B.C. | 2018 IL App (3d) 170025 | By WRIGHT | 20180612195 | Leagle.com
     

    IN RE B.C.

    No. 3-17-0025.

    2018 IL App (3d) 170025

    In re B.C., a Minor (The People of the State of Illinois, Petitioner-Appellee, v. B.C., Respondent-Appellant).

    Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

    Filed February 21, 2018.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Christopher W. Bohlen , of Barmann, Bohlen & Jacobi, P.C., of Kankakee, for appellant.

    Jim Rowe , State's Attorney, of Kankakee ( Patrick Delfino , Lawrence M. Bauer , and Jasmine D. Morton , of State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Office, of counsel), for the People.

    Presiding Justice Carter and Justice Schmidt concurred in the judgment and opinion.


    OPINION

    ¶ 1 Respondent, B.C., appeals from the circuit court's denial of his petition to terminate registration as a sex offender. B.C. argues that (1) the circuit court improperly interpreted the applicable statute and (2) the court's decision was contrary to the manifest...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases