KOENIG & STREY GMAC v. RENAISSANT 1000

Nos. 1-16-1783, 1-16-0771.

68 N.E.3d 881 (2016)

2016 IL App (1st) 161783

KOENIG & STREY GMAC REAL ESTATE, a limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. RENAISSANT 1000 SOUTH MICHIGAN I, LP, an Illinois limited partnership; Renaissant 1000 South Michigan, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; First American Bank; Destefano and Partners, Ltd., an Illinois corporation; Trainor Glass Company, an Illinois corporation; Curtain Wall and Design Consulting Incorporated, a Texas corporation; and Unknown Owners, Heirs, Legatees and Non-Record Claimants, Defendants. First American Bank, an Illinois banking corporation, Plaintiff and Defendant-Appellee, v. Renaissant 1000 South Michigan LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; Renaissant 1000 South Michigan I, L.P., an Illinois limited partnership; Warren Barr; James Carroll; John Borkowski; Edward Borkowski; Richard Borkowski; Contractors Lien Services, Inc.; Destafano and Partners Ltd.; Trainor Glass Company; Curtain Wall & Design Consulting Incorporated; Koenig and Strey GMAC Real Estate; Tishman Construction Corporation of Illinois; Chicago Title Land and Trust Company, as trustee under trust number 1106328; 1000 South Michigan Avenue, LLC; Unknown Owners; and Non-Record Claimants, Defendants (John Borkowski; Edward Borkowski; and Richard Borkowski, Defendants-Appellants).

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division.

Rehearing Denied December 21, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gino L. DiVito , John M. Fitzgerald , and Ashley Crettol Insalaco , of Tabet DiVito & Rothstein, LLC, of Chicago, and Kenneth J. Nemec, Jr. , William J. Hrabak, Jr. , and Sara L. Spitler , of Goldstine, Skrodzki, Russian, Nemec & Hoff, Ltd., of Burr Ridge, for appellants.

John Robert Weiss , Rosanne Ciambrone , and Elinor Murarova , of Duane Morris LLP, of Chicago, for appellee.


OPINION

¶ 1 The defendants, John Borkowski, Edward Borkowski and Richard Borkowski (collectively referred to as the Borkowskis), appeal from a $18,421,241.04 judgment entered against them on a guaranty agreement which they executed in favor of the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases