1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 975 N.E.2d
  5. 975 N.E.2d 203 (2012)
 

CINCINNATI INS. CO. v. CHAPMAN

No. 1-11-1792.

975 N.E.2d 203 (2012)

363 Ill. Dec. 401

The CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnold CHAPMAN and C.T. Phoenix of Indiana, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.

June 29, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson & Wanca, Rolling Meadows ( Brian J. Wanca , David M. Oppenheim , of counsel), for appellant Arnold Chapman.

Bock & Hatch, LLC, Chicago ( Phillip A. Bock , of counsel), for appellant C.T. Phoenix of Indiana, Inc.

Cray Huber Horstman Heil & VanAusdal LLC, Chicago ( James K. Horstman , of counsel), for appellee.

OPINION

Justice HARRIS delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.

¶ 1 In March of 2010, plaintiff, the Cincinnati Insurance Company (CIC), filed a complaint for declaratory relief against defendants, C.T. Phoenix of Indiana, Inc. (Phoenix), and Arnold Chapman, seeking a judgment declaring that CIC was not obligated to defend and indemnify Phoenix in its underlying lawsuit with Chapman. Chapman had previously filed the underlying suit against...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases