1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 917 N.E.2d
  5. 917 N.E.2d 1086 (2009)
 

HENRY v. PANASONIC FACTORY AUTOMATION CO.

No. 4-09-0057.

917 N.E.2d 1086 (2009)

335 Ill.Dec. 22

Keith HENRY and Sue Henry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PANASONIC FACTORY AUTOMATION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, and Panasonic Factory Automation Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TRW Automotive U.S., LLC, Third-Party Defendant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

Rehearing Denied December 3, 2009.

Justice MYERSCOUGH delivered the opinion of the court:

In June 2004, plaintiffs, Keith and Sue Henry, filed a two-count complaint against defendant, Panasonic Factory Automation Company (Panasonic), alleging Keith was injured at work while using equipment designed and manufactured by Panasonic that was unreasonably dangerous. Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's December 2008 decision to grant Panasonic's motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases