1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 367 P.3d
  5. 367 P.3d 136 (2016)
 

DOE v. SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES

No. 43165.

367 P.3d 136 (2016)

In the Matter of John Doe I, a Minor Child. John DOE (2015-05) and Jane Doe, Petitioners-Respondents-Cross Appellants, v. SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES, Intervenor-Appellant-Cross Respondent, and Idaho Department of Health and Welfare and Attorney for the Minor Child, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho. Boise, September 2015 Term.

February 1, 2016.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of Tribal Attorneys, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, attorneys for appellant. Brandelle Whitworth argued.

Justin R. Seamons , Idaho Falls, attorney for respondents.

Gaffney Law Office, Idaho Falls, attorney for respondent Minor Child. Laurie Gaffney argued.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden , Idaho Attorney General, Boise, attorney for respondent Idaho Department of Health and Welfare. Mark Withers argued.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

This case arises out of Appellant's, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes), intervention in the adoption proceedings of a minor child (Child). While the adoption itself is not at issue on appeal, disputes that arose during the adoption proceedings are. Respondents, Jane and John Doe (Does), initiated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases