1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 343 P.3d
  5. 343 P.3d 41 (2015)
 

917 LUSK, LLC v. CITY OF BOISE

No. 41214.

343 P.3d 41 (2015)

917 LUSK, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF BOISE, a political subdivision in the State of Idaho, Respondent, and Royal Boulevard Associates, LP, an Idaho limited partnership, Intervenor-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, June 2014 Term.

February 10, 2015.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Spink Butler, LLP, Boise, for appellant. JoAnn Butler argued.

Givens Pursley, LLP, Boise, for respondent Royal Boulevard Associates, LP. Gary Allen argued.

Boise City Attorney's Office, Boise, for respondent City of Boise. Mary Watson argued.

This case arises from 917 Lusk, LLC's (Lusk) petition for judicial review of the Boise City Council's (City Council) decision granting a conditional use permit for Royal Boulevard Associates, LP (Royal) to build an apartment complex. The Ada County district court affirmed the City Council's decision and Lusk timely appealed. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases