BELSTLER v. SHELER

No. 37893.

264 P.3d 926 (2011)

Chris BELSTLER and Dana Belstler, husband and wife, Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants/Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. Karen SHELER (Conine), and Howard Conine, husband and wife, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs/Respondents/Cross-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, September 2011 Term.

Rehearing Denied December 29, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur B. Macomber , Coeur d'Alene, argued for appellants.

Dodson & Raeon Law Offices, Coeur d'Alene, for respondents. Charles M. Dodson , argued.


BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This case concerns the existence of two disputed roadways or easements over the Appellants Belstlers' property benefitting Respondents Conines. In resolving the appeal, we address the separate holdings of the Honorable James R. Michaud's original Memorandum Decision finding express easements over both the northern and southern easements and a prescriptive easement upon the northern easement; and the Honorable Lansing L. Haynes' subsequent Memorandum...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases