1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 264 P.3d
  5. 264 P.3d 897 (2011)
 

JASSO v. CAMAS COUNTY

No. 37258.

264 P.3d 897 (2011)

Stephen V. JASSO, Petitioner-Respondent, v. CAMAS COUNTY, Idaho, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Respondent-Appellant. Curtis and Camie Gorringe, husband and wife, Petitioners-Respondents. v. Camas County, Idaho, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho, Respondent-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, June 2011 Term.

November 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moore Smith Buxton & Turcke, Chtd., Boise, for appellant. Paul J. Fitzer argued.

The Roark Law Firm, Hailey, for respondent Jasso. James W. Phillips argued.

Benjamin W. Worst, P.C., Ketchum for respondents Gorringe. Benjamin W. Worst argued.

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a petition for judicial review of the Camas County Board of Commissioners' (Board) decision to approve a preliminary subdivision plat. The district court held that the Board's findings of fact and conclusions of law did not amount to a reasoned statement as required by I.C. § 67-6535 and that the lack of a reasoned statement violated the petitioners' substantial right to due process. The district court also held that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases