STUART v. STATE

No. 34200.

232 P.3d 813 (2010)

Gene Francis STUART, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of Idaho, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, November 2009 Term.

May 10, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett, LLP, Boise, and Federal Defender Services of Idaho, Moscow, for appellant. Oliver Loewy argued.

Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. L. Lamont Anderson argued.


HORTON, Justice.

Gene Frances Stuart (Stuart) appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his fourth petition for post-conviction relief as untimely under I.C. § 19-2719. In this appeal, Stuart argues that I.C. § 19-2719 is inapplicable to him as it does not retroactively apply to his case, it is an ex post facto law, it violates the Idaho Constitution's separation of powers, it violates his equal protection and due process rights under the Idaho...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases