1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 224 P.3d
  5. 224 P.3d 494 (2009)
 

DOE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

Nos. 35639, 35681.

224 P.3d 494 (2009)

John DOE I, John Doe II, and Ronald Morgan, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, a corporation, and Ore-Ida Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America, an Idaho corporation, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2009 Term.

Rehearing Denied February 8, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock, & Fields, Chtd., Boise, for appellant Boy Scouts of America. Gary T. Dance argued.

Hall, Farley, Oberrecht, & Blanton, P.A., Boise, for appellant Ore-Ida Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America. Richard E. Hall argued.

Pfau, Cochran, Vertetis, Kosnoff, L.L.P., Seattle, WA, Chasan & Walton, L.L.C., Boise, and James, Vernon, & Weeks, Couer d'Alene, for respondents. Timothy C. Walton argued.

J. JONES, Justice.

The Boy Scouts of America and the Ore-Ida Council, Inc., Boy Scouts of America (collectively the BSA) were granted a permissive interlocutory appeal to challenge the district court's ruling that the claims asserted in this case by Ronald Morgan, John Doe I, and John Doe II (collectively the Does) are not barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I.

Factual and Procedural History

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases