1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 204 P.3d
  5. 204 P.3d 522 (2009)
 

CHERRY v. COREGIS INS. CO.

No. 34404.

204 P.3d 522 (2009)

Tina M. CHERRY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois insurance company, doing business in Idaho under Certificate of Authority No. PC602, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Rexburg, September 2008 Term.

March 13, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson Julian & Hull, Boise, for appellant. Brian Julian argued.

Goicoechea Law Offices, Pocatello, for respondent. Albert Matsuura argued.

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal involves the interpretation of offset clauses contained in an underinsured motorist insurance (UIM) policy and the interrelationship of that policy and Idaho's worker's compensation laws. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Respondent Tina Cherry (Cherry), holding that Appellant Coregis Insurance Company (Coregis) was not entitled to offset funds Cherry received from Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers) on behalf of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases