ATTY. DISCIPLINARY BD. v. ATTY. DOE NO. 762

No. 13-0856.

839 N.W.2d 620 (2013)

IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, v. ATTORNEY DOE NO. 762, Respondent, Jane Doe and John Doe, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

November 8, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Harrington and Amanda K. Robinson , Des Moines, for complainant.

Max E. Kirk and Eashaan Vajpeyi of Ball, Kirk & Holm, P.C., Waterloo, and Heather A. Prendergast of Roberts, Stevens, Prendergast & Guthrie, P.L.L.C., Waterloo, for respondent.

Roxanne Barton Conlin of Roxanne Conlin & Associates, P.C., Des Moines, for appellants.


APPEL, Justice.

We are called upon to consider whether a witness testifying before the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa is entitled to the presence of counsel. In this case, the commission president entered an order which, among other things, quashed the appearance of an attorney for a witness before the commission. We conclude a person called upon to be a witness before our grievance commission may be represented by counsel for the limited purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases