SUPREME COURT ATTY. DISC. BD. v. ROUSH

No. 12-2089.

827 N.W.2d 711 (2013)

IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, v. Stanley A. ROUSH, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

March 1, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Harrington and Wendell J. Harms , Des Moines, for complainant.

Stanley A. Roush, Cedar Rapids, pro se.


MANSFIELD, Justice.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding concerns a criminal defense attorney's federal criminal conviction for possession of cocaine base. The incident occurred because the attorney had an untreated substance abuse problem. The attorney does not dispute that he committed an ethical violation, and the main issue we need to decide is the appropriate sanction. Based on our review of this matter, including the aggravating and mitigating circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases