1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 766 N.W.2d
  5. 766 N.W.2d 626 (2009)
 

IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTY. DISC. BD. v. PLUMB

No. 08-1413.

766 N.W.2d 626 (2009)

IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, v. Van PLUMB, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

June 5, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Harrington and David Grace, Des Moines, for complainant.

Alfredo Parrish of Parrish Kruidenier Dunn Boles Gribble Parrish Gentry & Fisher, L.L.P., Des Moines, for respondent.

HECHT, Justice.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged the respondent, Van Plumb, violated several ethical rules by divulging a client's secrets or confidences, neglecting clients' cases, attempting to persuade a client to withdraw an ethical complaint, failing to respond to a complaint filed by the board, failing to provide responses to the board's discovery requests, failing to provide clients with an accounting for unearned retainers, failing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases