BARNES, Presiding Judge.
Charles Clark appeals the denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction for enticing a child for indecent purposes. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
Clark argues that the State failed to prove the elements of enticement under OCGA § 16-6-5, and thus the evidence does not sustain his conviction. We disagree.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
