1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 730 S.E.2d
  5. 730 S.E.2d 421 (2012)
 

WRIGHT v. COFIELD

No. A12A0080.

730 S.E.2d 421 (2012)

WRIGHT v. COFIELD et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

July 11, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adamson Bennett Starr and John Howell Williamson , Atlanta, for Appellant.

Peter F. Boyce , Catherine M. Packwood , Duluth, Johannes S. Kingma , Atlanta, William W. Keith III , Chatsworth, Warren N. Coppedge Jr. , Joseph Blake Evans , Stephen Michmerhuizen , Dalton, for Appellee.

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

This appeal arises from a business dispute between Carl Wright and several Defendants, including Charles Cofield and Russell Neuman. The trial court granted summary judgment to the Defendants on the ground that the alleged oral contract was too vague to be enforceable. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases