Per Curiam.
In this appeal, the appellant claims that the trial court erred by denying his claim for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The appellant argues that the trial court erred by finding his newly discovered evidence unreliable. Because the trial court's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence, we affirm.
...Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.