Per Curiam.
We affirm the order denying appellant's motion for postconviction relief because it was legally insufficient. We do note that the court erred in determining that it was untimely, as appellant had two years from the date of the circuit court's mandate on appellant's appeal in which to file his motion for relief. See Huff v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
