Per Curiam.
Appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his amended postconviction motion without a hearing. While we do not pass upon the merits of Appellant's arguments, we agree that he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing as to one ground he raised. See Strickland v. Washington,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
