1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.3d
  4. 299 So.3d
  5. 299 So.3d 481 (2020)
 

GYPTEC, S.A. v. HAKIM-DACCACH

No. 3D19-1629.

299 So.3d 481 (2020)

GYPTEC, S.A. now known as Violet Investment Corp. S.A. en Liquidación, et al., Appellants, v. Carlos HAKIM-DACCACH, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed February 26, 2020.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, and Juan P. Morillo , Daniel Pulecio-Boek and Gianna Puccinelli (Washington, D.C.), David M. Cooper (New York, NY), and Alex H. Loomis (Boston, MA); Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, and James Lee and Andrew Beyda , Miami; Greenberg Traurig, P.A., and Elliot H. Scherker , Brigid F. Cech Samole , Miami, and Bethany J. M. Pandher , Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Sequor Law, P.A., and Edward H. Davis, Jr. , Arnoldo B. Lacayo and Amanda E. Finley , Miami; Waldman Barnett, PL, and Glen H. Waldman and Michael A. Sayre , Coconut Grove, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.

The Appellants, Gyptec, S.A., n.k.a. Violet Investment Corporation, S.A. en Liquidacion, et al., ("Gyptec"), seek to reverse the trial court's imposition of a mandatory injunction in favor of Appellee, Dr. Hakim-Daccach ("Dr. Hakim"), ordering them to return $19.5 million to a restricted escrow account in Miami-Dade County, and to prohibit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases