Appellant was convicted of first-degree murder, armed burglary of a dwelling, and grand theft. Appellant's defense was self-defense. Appellant argues that the trial court failed to conduct a Frye hearing before permitting a toxicologist to testify that it was impossible to tell whether alcohol...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.