Makar, J.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred by failing to state that he applied the correct standards of review in denying the defendant's motion for new trial, which required that two standards be considered: (1) a sufficiency of the evidence standard (i.e., was the jury's verdict supported by sufficient evidence) and (2)...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.