Per Curiam.
Appellant claims that the trial court abused its discretion by revoking his sex offender probation after finding that he was "noncompliant." We agree, reverse the revocation of probation, and remand for further proceedings.
We agree with Appellant that the trial court's finding that Appellant was "noncompliant" was legally insufficient...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.