PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of the trial court's denial of his rule 3.850 motion. We affirm as to Grounds One, Three, Four and Five. However, we reverse as to Ground Two because it was facially sufficient and the attached records do not conclusively refute Appellant's claim.
We remand for the postconviction court to reconsider Ground Two...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
