Per Curiam.
We reverse the court's summary denial of Appellant's second claim for postconviction relief, which we conclude was facially sufficient. We remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on that claim or to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting it. See Odom v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.